The movie challenge continues. If you want to find out what this challenge is about, you can read up on the introductory post here. If you need a reminder on all the films that have been featured, you can choose to look at part 1 and part 2.
We're halfway through this movie challenge and this middle segment was not as easy as I expected. Keep reading to see what films made the cut...
M) M (1931)
My choice for the letter M was more complex than I thought originally. There were not many films starting with this letter that I had not seen or had a desire to watch (a recurring theme in this segment, it seems). I finally settled on M, a German thriller from the 1930s, which delves into the way a killer is found. The film centres around Berlin at a time when young children are disappearing. It's soon concluded that a killer is on the loose and the city becomes on high alert. After the eighth murder is committed and leads still have not been made, the city's criminal underworld decides it is up to them to rid the streets of such a monster. They organise a neighbourhood watch, using the local homeless network as the lookout. This works in their favour, and soon the killer is captured and tried in their makeshift trial (which is actually termed 'kangaroo court', who knew?). Before they can settle on the punishment, the law enforcement arrives and arrests everyone present. The film concludes at the real trial, while the grieving mothers of the children give the audience a powerful message.I quite enjoyed this film; it did seem confusing at times, mostly due to the limited technology in this era not making it clear how the scene progressed. However, despite this, I was taken aback by not only the effects, but also the manner in how the characters acted. It seemed fairly modern and you could imagine the same storyline being used in today's films with no thought that it originated in the 1930s. It is always a treat to see how cinemtaic techniques begin to take shape.
N) No Country For Old Men (2007)
A film that I had wanted to watch for a while and not having the opportunity, until it presented itself for this challenge. No Country For Old Men is another crime thriller, this time taking place in Texas during the 1980s. A hunter, by the name of Llewelyn Moss, stumbles across a drug deal gone wrong: all involved have been murdered in the middle of the desert. Soon on Moss's tail is Anton Chigurh, a ruthless hitman who appears to have no mercy for others and will not stop until he has successfully completed a job. Moss not only has to avoid getting caught by Chigurh, but also the local sheriff who quickly figures that Moss has gone on the run with money found in the drug deal disaster. A dog-cat-mouse chase can only conclude tragically for more than one character involved.
I have to admit that I was quite disappointed with this choice. The way that critics raved about this film, the fact that it was a big awards winner, I was expecting so much more, but instead I found myself to be bored. The storyline did not seem to go anywhere and all of the characters had no pull for me to be rooting for them. Perhaps if the pace was slightly quicker, it would have held my interest more. I really wanted to be impressed by this film but to me, it was fairly forgettable.
O) Orphan (2009)
Another letter I really struggled with; I tried resisting watching this film, mainly because I knew the ending and the concept sounded ridiculous. Alas, my mind went blank when it came to films beginning with the letter O and I settled in for the ride that was Orphan. The plot revolves around Kate and John, a couple who had experienced a stillborn in their recent past. John yearns for another sibling for their two children and Kate finally agrees to adoption. They adopt 9 year old Esther, a Russian child from the local orphanage. Soon after bringing Esther home, Kate notices odd events occurring around the family. It becomes obvious to the audience that Esther is like a female Damian from The Omen, torturing her new siblings along with animals, while graduating to murder when she kills the nun from her orphanage. Due to Kate's past as an alcoholic, these claims go unheard and Kate is made out to be having a mental breakdown due to her inability to cope with the loss of her daughter in birth. The film builds up to a startling revelation about Esther, and Kate is proven to be right with dire consequences.
I had the opposite reaction to this film than I did the last film on my list: a film I had no desire to watch turned out to be quite enjoyable. To be fair on me, this was mainly to do with the performances given by Vera Farmiga (Kate) and Isabelle Fuhrman (Esther). Even though Vera Farmiga has starred in a lot of film and television where she is the mother of a troubled child, she does it so convincingly and always brings a new approach to each character. Isabelle Fuhrman has a quality which allows her to play a 9 year old and a 33 year old (I did say the concept was ridiculous) without it seeming too far-fetched. Without these performances, the film could have become outlandish and audiences may not have been able to suspend their belief for the twist.
P) Pan's Labyrinth (2006)
No comments:
Post a Comment